Did an Exploding Black Hole Unleash a Powerful Neutrino Signal?
A super powerful neutrino signal was detected back in 2023, leaving scientists scratching their heads. I mean, this thing was off the charts – thousands of times more energetic than anything we can cook up here on Earth. So, what could have possibly caused it? A new theory suggests it might've been the explosion of a primordial black hole leaking dark electrons.
Andrea Thamm, a particle physicist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, mentioned that no one knows exactly what unleashed this neutrino. This is just one hypothesis, and with more data, we'll see if the theory holds.
Ghost Particles and Mediterranean Detectors
We're constantly bombarded by neutrinos, nearly massless particles that zip right through us. We only notice them when they smack into neutrino detectors. In February 2023, the European neutrino facility KM3NeT, off the coast of Malta, snagged an incredibly energetic neutrino. We're talking about 30,000 times more powerful than anything produced by the Large Hadron Collider.
It caught everyone off guard because there weren't any known astrophysical sources. But here's the kicker: only KM3NeT detected it. IceCube, another neutrino detector, didn't register the event, not even close. So, what gives?
Primordial Black Holes to the Rescue?
Thamm and her team think that primordial black holes might hold the key. These are hypothetical black holes born in the Big Bang. They're suspected to be lightweight and lose mass through Hawking radiation. Lighter primordial black holes get hotter, radiate more, and lose mass faster.
This research zeroes in on "quasi-extremal primordial black holes". These black holes have their Hawking radiation suppressed by dark electrons, much heavier versions of regular electrons. Eventually, the dark electric field around the black hole gets so strong that even the heavy dark electrons start leaking out. This leads to a super-fast explosion that emits neutrinos within a specific range of energy levels. This might explain why KM3NeT picked up the signal, while IceCube missed it.
There are, however, a lot of hypothetical assumptions in this model. Thamm acknowledges that this is just one possible explanation among many. Until further research emerges, physicists will continue to compare theories to find the best possible scenario.
"While we are very excited about the physics in our paper, this doesn’t mean that it is definitely the correct explanation of the origin of the neutrino," she said.
Source: Gizmodo